Within the vast topic of retirement, the concept of “the 4% Rule” hits right at the core of most people’s concerns: how much money is enough money to have in your savings when you finally reach retirement?
There’s no shortage of advice about how much you should save for retirement, but there’s a lot less clarity around how much money you’ll ultimately need when the time comes. This is what the 4% Rule addresses.
The 4% Rule is the typical advice about how much a retiree should withdraw from their savings to live on each year. The idea is that you can safely plan to withdraw and live off of 4% of your savings each year during retirement without risking running out of money before you pass away.
The upside to this go-to rule is its simplicity. Having a guideline from retirement spending that’s this clean and simple makes planning much easier. The downsides are that it’s a number that might become outdated by the time you reach retirement, and that any flat number doesn’t adjust for market conditions, which surely will change year to year.
Let’s dig into the 4% Rule a bit more — and unpack whether or not it might be a helpful guiding rule for your own retirement planning or whether it’s ill-equipped for the dynamic set of factors that rule over long-term savings and future spending.
In 1994, using historical data on stock and bond returns over a 50-year period — 1926 to 1976 — financial advisor William Bengen challenged the previous go-to thinking that withdrawing 5 percent yearly in retirement was a safe bet.
Based on a deep dive into the half century of market data, Bergen concluded that essentially any conceivable economic scenario (even the more tumultuous ones) would allow for a 4 percent withdrawal rate in retirement that would sustain for more than 30 years.
Not to dismiss the diligent work of William Bengen and the financial community that supported his conclusion, but, as with all pieces of conventional wisdom, the 4% Rule doesn’t account for countless variations in each person’s individual situation. This is not so much the result of a failing in the rule itself, or the math that backs it up, but an inherent failing of attaching any firm, flat rule to governing long-term financial planning, given that the economic landscape over a long term is anything but flat and firm.
Here are a few factors that opting for a set-it-and-forget-it 4% flat withdrawal rate in retirement doesn’t include:
So do these personal — and in some cases, wholly unknowable — details of our financial futures render the 4% Rule useless? Not at all. It just needs to be adapted for personal use.
And that’s really the point, both of the 4% Rule and any other financial rules of thumb: It’s less of a hard-and-fast mandate on what to do and more of a well-informed starting place, from which your own personal retirement savings and spending plan can be thoughtfully crafted. It doesn’t solve for everything you need to consider about retirement finances, but many people consider it a very useful frame of reference to jump off from.
That said, the applicability of the 4% Rule also depends on where your retirement assets are invested. If you’re primarily saving for retirement somewhere other than a portfolio of mostly stocks and bonds, then the 4% Rule is less likely to apply to your holdings. And even then, depending on the allocation between stocks and bonds, 4 percent might not be the right figure for your portfolio. Or it might be fitting today, but not 20 or 30 years from now. In any case, it’s between you and your financial advisor to figure out what projected withdrawal rate makes the most sense.